Results 2, Entropy Increase Rate
Now we examine whether or not the maximization
hypothesis of entropy increase rate is consistent
with the regime transition between the 2-D
and 3-D regimes. In contrast to Fig. 1, which
has nondimensional ordinate and abscissa,
an entropy increase rate is a dimensional
variable, and hence we examine it in dimensional
parameter space. Thus, the entropy increase
rates for 93 experiments, which have constant
heat flux of 800 W m-2, are shown in Fig. 3 in a common-logarithm space of the Coriolis
parameter and eddy diffusion coefficient.
Figure 3 shows that the entropy increase rate takes its minimal value around the separation curve between the 2-D and 3-D regimes in the perpendicular direction to the curve, for the most of the parameter range where is larger than three (< 10-3). For the region where is smaller than three, although the entropy increase rate does not take its minimum at the separation curve, the gradient of the entropy increase rate is still different across the 2-D and 3-D regimes in a consistent manner with the hypothesis as seen in the right panel in Fig. 1. Consequently, the changes of entropy increase rates associated with the 2-D and 3-D transition support the hypothesis, suggesting that the mechanism determining the 2-D and 3-D transition can be understood from considerations of macroscopic thermodynamics.
Figure 3. Common logarithm of entropy increase rates,
, in units of W/K (black contour) and the
separation curve between the 2-D and 3-D
regimes with the 2-D regime on the left hand
side of the curve in a log-space of the Coriolis
parameter and diffusivity. The crosses indicate
the parameters where experiments are conducted,
with the surface heat flux being fixed at
800 W m-2. The contour interval is 0.1, and all contour
values are negative (i.e., 0<<1).